I have read your answer and I must say that the answer is not wrong but not up to standards.
Definitely with this level of writing and interpretation in examination, no examiner can pass you.
You need to get more in-depth to the answer writing. You must write in a way where you assume that the examiner or the marker does not know anything about audit. You must write in a way to convince and explain what is the subject about.
It is like a Children asking for their parent to buy a toy. The Child if shout and scream that he want a toy like “I want the toy, I want the toy…………………..” it does not convince the parent the need for the toy. However if a reason being given like, like the child telling the parent by buying the toy it mark a very important memory in his childhood, will the parent be touched?
It is like watching a movie. Who wants to go into the cinema watching a movie where from beginning to the end, you need to guess what the movie is talking about? Or till the end of the movie you also not sure what the movie is talking about. How can a movie does not express an objective and do not express a contents that viewer willing to see.
Going for the exam is just like making a movie, you can take 1 year to film it but usually you have only 3 hrs to present it. You might take a year to complete a subject but at each time you only have 3 hrs to proof you worth.
You now need to build up the quality of your contents. How to make it? Practice Practice Practice
Best wishes
Layman
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment